Dbq Essay Crickets and Politics

The relationship between play and politics is clearly visualised in South Asia from 1880 to 2005 through the easing of the tension between divergent caste members, although the tension eased was not always from a ghostly aspect between the Pakistanis, Indians, and the British. The unalike problems that arose in South Asia was mostly club or caste systems (Docs 2, 3, 4), contender (Docs 1, 6, 10), and sacred tensions (Docs 5, 7, 8, 9) against the different countries and cricket aggroups. cricket in many ways was a unifying force for the different classes in India as well as the relationship between Britain and India.As seen in memorial 2, an Indian cricketer was invited to join the Sussex team, which was a team from England. This shows some comparability between the British and the Indians because the British typic from each oney saw the Indians as spurn than them in standards. However, this paper could eat left some things out and apply as a source of propaganda seein g that it was published by a British newspaper. (POV) This connection between the British and the Indians coffin nail also be seen in Document 3 because in the opinion of an English cricketer and historian, he tangle that cricket relates the rulers and the ruled. The ruler in this case was Britain and the ruled was India. Cricket was verbalise to be one of the most civilizing influences, and the one that did least harm, because quite than making the Indians grief over the fact that they were not an independent country, they gave them the swordplay of cricket, a source of happiness, moral training, and much than. A instinct of equality can be seen in Document 4 between the different castes in India. A lower caste Hindoo was allowed to be on a team just because he was good at cricket.The different team members took him into the team and ignored the fact that they werent from the same caste. This is a truly important example of unity because in history, different caste sy stems were never allowed to mix. For example, a lower caste woman could not marry a higher caste man. Accepting a lower caste Hindoo in a higher caste cricket team is a turn in history. Even though cricket was a genuinely uniting force, it was also the cause of rivalry throughout India. Cricket was a sport brought to India by the British and the Indians were pretty grateful towards the British for speech cricket.However, what they were not grateful for was the fact that the English would play polo on cricket grounds, as said in Document 1. Document 1 states that more than five hundred young men of all ages and of all castes follow up on this healthful sport on the Parade ground where alone they argon permitted to play and which is the only ground suitable for cricket. The Indians were arguing to the governor of the responsibleness of Bombay, India that the English were ruining the turf that they were playing cricket on by playing polo. They requested that the English should pl ay somewhere else and not on their turf.Furthermore, shown in Document 6, the Indians felt that when they defeated the European teams of Calcutta , that it was the only metre they were playing on the same level as the English. Fair and square. Usually, the British would have the authority potential wise, but the game of cricket evened it all out because when you play a sport, you cant win by support, but by skill. Document 10 showed another example of rivalry. The chairwoman timbres that Cricket is a sport that can bring people together and makes people ignore the fact that there are problems with water and etc.However, hes not one to say these things. Cricket has brought Indians and Pakistanis together in so many ways, just like the chairman said, We trade culture. We share a history. We share so much. Lastly, cricket played an important determination in the religious tensions between the Indians and Pakistanis or the Hindus and Muslims. Muhammad Ali Jinnah said in Document 5 that he hopes that the game of cricket teaches the different religious typefaces to unite and not fight nigh who won the game or confounded the game. He believes that cricket has many lessons to teach in other walks of life. This showed that although the religious tension was so great that they had to make two different countries for each religious side, they could still embrace the fact that they both share a common interest, cricket. In Document 7, an editorial in the Indian sports journal, they said that the purpose of the Quadrangular Tournament, a big cricket competition, has changed over the long time due to some self-seeking leaders, who wanted to gain ends by brainchild up religious fanaticism. They have turned the sport of cricket into a sport of religious rivalry.However, this editorial still agrees with the fact that cricket did not harm. This was an editorial so this article must have been very aslope in their opinions on this subject. Having opinions in an ar ticle is a very justly force because some opinions can move people and change their thoughts and ideas about something into something different. (POV) Mohandas Gandhi, the leader of the Indian freedom movement and the voice of Document 8 also agrees with Document 7. Gandhi believes that having the Tournaments between pietys is ridiculous.He says that if the Tournaments were between colleges and institutions, he could understand, but to have the Tournaments be between Hindu, Parsi, Muslim, and other religious teams is not understandable. Segregating teams by religion gave no way for competition to stir up. The game just became more of a religious movement. Document 9 shows a clear sense obvious religious tension. The Hindus aroma that they are the superior religion and when the Hindus retire a game of cricket, the Muslims should not be celebrating but mourning for the Hindus loss.I feel that this is very biased because it was written by the founder of a Hindu nationalist organiz ation and it is a very selfish statement as well. Cricket should be a fair game and each side has their own choice of mourning or celebrating. The Hindus should not have to be the judge on who can celebrate and who can be sad. (POV) I feel that it would be helpful if there were two extra documents explaining the cricket and politics connection even more in depth.One of the documents should be from a lower- caste cricket player and the other one should be from a higher-caste cricket player because most of the documents given were from a high precondition point of view. They were all newspapers, organizations, or high-class leaders. Giving the input from a lower-caste would give us an input on how they felt about the intact class situation in cricket. Did they think it was fair? Did they feel as if they were being treated equally or were they still looked down upon? The other document from the higher-caste cricket player would give insight on how they felt about the lower-caste play ing on their teams.How did they feel about it? Do they feel like they betrayed their caste system or was it still the same? In conclusion, cricket was not only a unifying sport between Indians-Pakistanis and Indians-British, it was also a sport that caused some rivalry and religious tensions. wholly sides had equal chance in winning the sport and for once, the British wouldnt have to start at the top, which gave the Indians a sense of nationalism and independence in a way. Cricket gave these sides a different way of expressing their rivalry between each other instead of bloodshed.