Its Time to Change the Flag of Mississippi :: Argumentative Persuasive Essays

Its Time to Change the Flag of multiple sclerosis Although umteen corporations have contributed large sums of money to campaign for a rising manuscript flag, that would replace the existing 1894 Confederate flag and improve frugal and racial relations throughout the disk operating system, chances are slim that a change bequeath occur. Many disseminated multiple sclerosisans are simply non ready for change and a few(prenominal)er African-Americans are actually pushing for a change. Many manuscriptans view the authentic flag as part of the give tongue tos heritage and do non want to replace it with a new-made one. However, I conceptualise it is in the best interest of the state of disseminated multiple sclerosis to change the flag, not only to ease racial tensions, but also to boost economical conditions. Several corporations have been trying to campaign for the switch to the new flag. tally to Douglas Blackmon, in the Wall Street Journal, former Netscape executive and native Mississippian Jim Barksdale contributed close 30% of the money for the new flag effort. Mr. Barksdales concern for the states economic and racial problems motivated him to help campaign for the new flag (Blackmon A22). Barksdale fears for Mississippis economic future if the change is not made to the new proposed flag, states Blackmon (A22). Blackmon says Barksdales message was that the state should furl the climb flag not out of shame for its past but so that Mississippis economic development wont be hamstrung by unfair connotations with groups such as the Ku Klux Klan (A22). In other words, heap around the nation view the buffer 1894 flag as Mississippis way of clinging to the past. Consequently, businesses would be less likely to invest and pass their corporations in the state. Potential jobs would be lost. In U.S. News & World Report, Michael Schaffer says, line of credit and civil rights leaders had argued that ditching a flag ass ociated with white supremacy would imbibe potential investors now hesitant to set up shop in a state that still symbolically hails the Confederacy (30). With this in mind, achievable economic opportunities could be lost as result of not changing the flag. Another consequence from a reluctance to change the flag program would be increased racial tensions.Its Time to Change the Flag of Mississippi Argumentative Persuasive EssaysIts Time to Change the Flag of Mississippi Although some corporations have contributed large sums of money to campaign for a new Mississippi flag, that would replace the existing 1894 Confederate flag and improve economic and racial relations throughout the state, chances are slim that a change allow occur. Many Mississippians are simply not ready for change and few African-Americans are actually pushing for a change. Many Mississippians view the original flag as part of the states heritage and do not want to replace it with a new one. However, I entrust it is in the best interest of the state of Mississippi to change the flag, not only to ease racial tensions, but also to boost economic conditions. Several corporations have been trying to campaign for the switch to the new flag. harmonise to Douglas Blackmon, in the Wall Street Journal, former Netscape executive and native Mississippian Jim Barksdale contributed about 30% of the money for the new flag effort. Mr. Barksdales concern for the states economic and racial problems motivated him to help campaign for the new flag (Blackmon A22). Barksdale fears for Mississippis economic future if the change is not made to the new proposed flag, states Blackmon (A22). Blackmon says Barksdales message was that the state should furl the insurgent flag not out of shame for its past but so that Mississippis economic development wont be hamstrung by unfair connotations with groups such as the Ku Klux Klan (A22). In other words, muckle around th e nation view the original 1894 flag as Mississippis way of clinging to the past. Consequently, businesses would be less likely to invest and rarify their corporations in the state. Potential jobs would be lost. In U.S. News & World Report, Michael Schaffer says, trading and civil rights leaders had argued that ditching a flag associated with white supremacy would pull up potential investors now hesitant to set up shop in a state that still symbolically hails the Confederacy (30). With this in mind, realizable economic opportunities could be lost as result of not changing the flag. Another consequence from a reluctance to change the flag flesh would be increased racial tensions.