Ode on a Grecian Urn and Ode to a Nightingale analysis. Both by John Keats

Ode on a Grecian Urn and to a Nightingale Ode on a Grecian Urn draws out two different emotions. Firstly, cheer is drawn out, mostly due to the fact that Keats uses the word skilful so many times. Upon reading the verse form again I invent hints of sadness when examining the urn. The beginning of the numbers is one of gaiety and marvel as Keats asks what men or gods atomic number 18 these, referring to the figures on the placement of the urn. Keats seems intrigued by the beauty of the urn and how incessantlyything on the urn may mellow entirely is ceaselessly imprinted on the case. But when reading the poem over I see a different side of the poem. I imagine that Keats is second guessing the blessing of macrocosm unendingized on the urn. The forever figures on the urn argon just a tragic varan of glorious times passed that may neer be seen again. As in lines 36-40 in which Keats states that citadels are emptied of people, streets are empty and unruffled an d no one provide ever return. Another disappoint setback of the immortality of the urn is its repetition. Being imprinted with paint on the side of the urn in paint gives no life to the figures. They are confine in the position for all eternity with no capabilities. Who would want an immortal life with the curse of being trapped when one could life a mortal life broad of free will, and excerpt making? Line 17 speaks of a lover who can not kiss his partner because he is stuck in position. Ode to a Nightingale is a tough poem to read. Keats is somehow thinned by the song that gives him pleasure. Keats may be jealous of the nightingale, possibly of the simplicity of... If you want to get a full essay, baffle it on our website: OrderCustomPaper.com

If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: write my paper