Ontological Argument for God’s existence Essay

To asses the strengths of the onto limpid end for immortals populateence, we firstly need to gain what it entails. The Onto limpid Argument looks at proof A Priori, which is Analytical truth, reason based proof. This suffer be explained by saying 1+1=2. We know this to be true, as it is based on reasoning, and is a logical statement. This can be seen as a strength of the ontological Argument, the occurrence that it is logical and rational. It deals with knowledge gained independently of experience, innate knowledge. It does non lend oneself any external evidence, it exactly uses the comment of the word paragon. It therefrom claims that if you understand what God is, then you understand that he must(prenominal) personify.St. Anselm, an Archbishop of Canterbury, first proposed the ontological Argument in his book Proslogian, agree to Anselm, both theists and atheists have a definition of God, if sole(prenominal) for atheists to dismiss his lastence. Therefore, Anselm c laims, God exists in the mind. This could be considered a strength of the Ontological Argument for Gods existence. The fact that if you use the word God, then you, yourself must have an understanding of the meaning of the word. To use the word we show we have an desire of God which exists in our minds. However, existing in the mind is one thing, but to exist in reality is a nonher.Lord, not only argon You that then which nothing great can be conceived but you are also something great than can be conceived St. Anselm, Proslogion.As Anselm states above, God is that which nothing greater can be conceived, therefore not only must he exist in the mind, but in reality. This is because it is greater to exist in reality than only if in the mind. There is strength in this point, as what Anselm is saying is true. It is greater to exist in reality, that in the mind alone. For congressman if we had not eaten for a week, it would be heartfelt to imagine a 3 vogue meal, however, to actuall y receive that meal, and make it a reality, would be even better. As God is described as the greatest, then this helps to rise his existence.Rene Descartes supported Anselms argument, he had strengths in his propose in which he tell that if your minds exists, then it is logical to assume that take ideas which come into your mind are true. His proposition began with I have an idea of God and finished with Therefore God, as the acquit and distinct idea of supreme god must exist. He maintain that his idea of God is one of a supremely perfect creation, and one of the attributes of graven image is existence. This is similar to Anselms argument, and bears the same assets of being logical and plausible.